Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Is the Telephone Booking Process Hurting Your Sales?

Funneling hot prospects into the telephone booking process is like having a giant speed bump slowing down sales!

Comments from actual Partywirks customers
  • "People don't like to call on the phone ...they just want to book their order online."
  • "We are getting fewer messages and more hang-ups"
  • "People are impatient. If we miss their call they book elsewhere before we can get back with them"
Sound familiar? This trend is not going away but in fact speeding up!
The  bottom line - you may have the greatest staff, facilities and offerings in town but if people won't pick up the phone, will you get a chance to shine?

There is a More Modern, Effective Way - Offer The Real-Time Alternative!
It's no secret, at least to Partywirks clients. Most consumers today prefer booking online:
  • Instant access to everything they need to make a decision.
  • No waiting - it's immediate and available on their schedule.
  • Better, more complete information. Less "he said, she said" conflict. They "think"
  • they are getting better, more accurate information when they can see it in writing,
  • on the screen, then when they hear it from someone over the phone (and they are).
  • No pressure from staff people pushing add-ons. People actually buy many more add-ons online then they do over the phone  because they have the time & information to make decisions at their own pace.
Those who want to call can "still call" but for over 50% of your customers, the online alternative will be their first choice.
Chances are you book hotels online, buy your plane ticket online and maybe your books and clothes as well. Now your party venue can offer this same online convenience!

Imagine the difference online booking can make in your business!
Partywirks creatively combines the convenience of Online Scheduling with Sales of Add-on Items  for more revenue and happier customers! What could be better?  Watch our video for more....then schedule a demo below for a personal review of how Partywirks might help your business!
Let's Get This Party Started!

Partywirks is "Cloud Computing" - the hottest trend in computing today.

The Week the Cloud Won
By QUENTIN HARDY
February 24, 2012, 5:10 pm 

This was a milestone week for enterprise computing: The cloud won.

On Tuesday, Dell reported lower earnings, and said sales in the current quarter would fall 7 percent. On Wednesday, Hewlett-Packard, that other stalwart of enterprise hardware, also reported lower earnings, and also projected a lower outlook for both the quarter and the year.

Meg Whitman, H.P.’s chief executive, said a full transformation of H.P. might take as long as five years.

Then on Thursday, Salesforce.com, which rents business software through a cloud-computing based system, said its fourth-quarter revenue was up 38 percent. Salesforce also raised its revenue projections for 2012, to a rise of 30 percent year on year.

If these reports hold up elsewhere, it would seem that businesses are moving to cloud computing faster than almost anyone would have thought a year ago. Salesforce and others are rushing to offer more applications to businesses via the cloud, and old-line software giants like SAP and Oracle are spending billions to buy and build their way into the cloud.

This doesn’t just change the software business, but it does radically affect the hardware business. The cloud is a collection of thousands of computer servers, bought by companies that are buying in volume, and care less about brand. Laptops and desktops don’t get as much wear and tear when a business is connected to the cloud. Those stalwarts also face competition from tablets and smartphones, as employees find they can do more tasks on mobile devices.

If the changes are happening as rapidly as this week’s earnings suggest, all the traditional manufacturers, resellers, consultants and other camp followers of the current client/server computing world, who thought they had a few more years to adjust to the new realities, are having a really bad day.

“We’re at a tipping point, where mission-critical applications are moving into the cloud,” says Rick Sherlund, an analyst with Nomura Securities. “The hardware is different, the infrastructure is different; it affects a lot of things.”

To be sure, comparisons among the three companies are far from perfect: aside from the individual woes and triumphs at each company, Dell and H.P. are still much bigger companies than Salesforce. H.P.’s revenue on the quarter is more than 10 times as big as Salesforce’s for the year, though H.P. also has much lower profit margins. After accounting for things like stock-based compensation and amortization of intangibles, Salesforce lost 3 cents a share in the last quarter, and 9 cents on the year. Critics would say this is an apples and oranges comparison.

But apples and oranges are both fruit. You can similarly abstract the differences among these companies, and make some decent comparisons. They all have the same customers, for example, and most of those buyers are looking for a cheaper alternative. They are all publicly traded companies too, and for the most part have the same type of investors. The day after their respective earnings came out, Dell shares fell about 6 percent, and H.P. shares fell 7 percent. Salesforce gained 8.6 percent.

As much as a stock price is a bet on the future, Salesforce appeared to have a better outlook.

As printed in the New York Times Feb 24 2012

Retailers Add Gadgets for Shoppers at Ease With Technology

This is a trend we have been following, and helping to create, for years now. With the advent of iPads and the bevy of other hand-held computer devices and web services available today consumers are doing more self-service all the time…why spend time tracking down a sales person when you can find more information, better information and information faster and more conveniently online?

Event though you may not be a traditional “retailer” as defined in this article, the change in consumer behavior does impact your party business.  Consumers will not invest a lot of time calling, leaving voice-mails or waiting on someone to call them back. They click off your site and move on and that means a lost sale.

The question is, what are you doing to adjust to this new reality?

Published in the New York Times, March 9 2012,By STEPHANIE CLIFFORD

When Nadia Karim goes shopping, she doesn’t wait around for salespeople. She saves items from apps and Web sites on her cellphone as a shopping list. And as she browses one store — recently trying on Sam Edelman flats at Nordstrom — she uses the phone to check out styles at competitors like Macy’s.

“In all honesty, because I shop so much, I feel sometimes I know the brands better than some of the associates,” said Ms. Karim, 26, an analyst at Intel in Phoenix. For a generation of shoppers raised on Google and e-commerce, the answer to “Can I help you?” is increasingly a firm “no,” even at retailers like Nordstrom that have built their reputations around customer service.

But instead of getting defensive, some stores and brands are embracing the change by creating new personal touches that feature gadgets rather than a doting sales staff. Bobbi Brown has touch-screen televisions to demonstrate the perfect smoky eye, something that was once the exclusive domain of makeup artists.

The basketball star LeBron James’s shoe store in Miami has 50 iPads to describe its merchandise. Macy’s is testing cosmetics stations where tablets offer reviews and tips. And at C. Wonder, shoppers use a touchpad to personalize the lighting and music in dressing rooms (there is also a button in case, olden-days style, they need to call for help).

The self-service theme, which started years ago with checkout at groceries, has progressed to the point where shoppers can navigate entire stores without once having to say, “Just looking, thanks.”

Companies are adding the technology now because it has gotten cheap enough to make it feasible and because Apple and other tablet and touch-screen makers are increasing their sales efforts. Stores also don’t want to risk losing those customers who are not content shopping from home but nonetheless prefer Pinterest recommendations, Zappos reviews and Fashism feedback to interacting with someone behind the counter.

“There’s a tendency to believe that if you talk to somebody, they’re going to waste your time or sell you something you don’t need,” said Ricardo Quintero, global general manager of market development for Clinique, which uses touch screens at its counters. “It’s taking the pressure off.”

In Nordstrom’s case, customers have surprised the retailer. Nordstrom introduced an app in the fall that executives expected people would mostly use remotely to order items while they were watching TV or waiting for a train. In addition to that, though, customers used the app while shopping at Nordstrom rather than approach the sales staff.

“How the customer is defining service and wants service to be delivered is changing pretty rapidly, and a lot of that is driven by technology,” said Erik Nordstrom, president of stores for Nordstrom. “A lot of customers like to touch and feel and try on the merchandise, but they also want that information that they get online.”

Nordstrom has added Wi-Fi to almost all its stores, in part so its app will work fast, and is testing charging stations and clusters of iPads and computers. It does not limit what people can do on the in-store devices, Mr. Nordstrom said. “It’s to have our stores be relevant, be a helpful place for people to be whether they’re shopping from us or stopping to check their e-mail,” he said.

The plain truth, some retail analysts say, is that businesses of all sorts have no choice but to accommodate consumers who are trained to do research on their own — and prefer doing so. Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland now gives suite visitors an iPad so they can order food and drinks directly from it, while Aloft Hotels, a Starwood division, has installed tablets instead of concierge stations.

At Land Rover, the addition of online tools for research has cut down sharply on dealer visits. In 2000, people, on average, made 7.5 visits to a dealer before placing an order. In 2010, that figure was 1.3 visits, with shoppers conducting 80 percent of their research on their own, said Andy Goss, president of Jaguar Land Rover North America.

The new technology is also being adapted by manufacturers who have been dependent on employees at big-box stores to sell their products but now see the opportunity for a direct line to the customer.

Scott Paul, chief executive of iPad Enclosures, which installs technology for retailers, said Samsung and other manufacturers were considering adding iPads that offered live video chat with a Samsung salesperson at stores like Best Buy. “You can use the kiosk to do better, in a lot of cases, than a 17- or 18-year-old sales rep,” Mr. Paul said.

The replacement of salespeople with screens is not without its detractors. Some people worry about jobs, though stores say that for now they are not getting rid of employees to accommodate their digital counterparts. And Sherry Turkle, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said that shoppers lost something intrinsic to the human experience when they avoided salespeople.

“The point is not to be nostalgic for the good old days, but to ask ourselves, what kind of society do we want?” said Professor Turkle, the author of “Alone Together,” a book on people’s relationships with technology. With technology replacing human interaction, she said, “you’ve taken out a lot of the richness, the messiness and the demandingness of actually having to deal with people.”

Ms. Karim, the Phoenix shopper, says that she does not avoid all salespeople, but that technology has given her the freedom to be choosy. She still enjoys chatting with makeup-counter salespeople, for example, and getting suggestions from personal shoppers.

“It’s fun to see things in person, and touch the fabrics, and try on shoes,” she said. “It’s a social experience.”